movie

Dude Review: Glee

Posted on February 3, 2010 at 12:01 am

by Richard

As I might have mentioned a time or two in the past, I hate musicals. Well, I might have to modify that a bit. Not only did I love the Bride & Prejudice movie, I also enjoyed a recent show of South Pacific at a local theater and I’ve become convinced that a musical is one of the best shows on television (along with Lost of course) right now.

I’m talking about Glee, on Fox. Now, understand I still have some sort of antipathy toward the form, but I actually bought the Glee DVD for myself for Christmas. I’d been talking to a couple of the moms down to Speed Racer’s elementary school and they were raving about the show. I figured since it was on a deep-discount sale at Amazon.com I might as well get it. And, boy, am I glad I did.

I popped the first DVD into the player a couple of days ago after I’d been subjected (read tortured by) to a few hours of my wife’s, known to me as She Who Likes Reality Shows Far, Far Too Much, choices. She settled back in her chair, prepared to go to sleep. I did not have high hopes.

Until about one minute into the show. Then I was riveted. I couldn’t look away. At the end of the pilot episode, from the chair next to me, I heard: “Do you have more of these?”

“Yes.”

“Now, please.”

“Yes.”

We haven’t been able to stop watching the first season. Fortunately, the show won a Golden Globe so that speaks well of it coming back for a second season.

Glee is the story of Will Schuster, played by Matthew Morrison, a high-school Spanish teacher who, once upon a time, was a big star in the glee club. But now, the glee club is home only to losers and outcasts who start the day with a Slurpee facial. Administered, of course, by the cool kids or the football players. Even worse, the cheerleaders, the Cheerios, are the stars of the school and their instructor basically gets whatever she wants, including uniforms dry cleaned in Europe. She’s out to destroy the glee club to get all of her budget back.

It’s a fantastic show, with laughs, fantastic musical numbers, and actual drama. You really don’t want to miss it. If you don’t want to buy the DVD, you can find full episodes at Fox.com. Even better news, new episodes start airing on April 13. I know where I’ll be that night.

Share on Facebook Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Groundhog Day*

Posted on February 2, 2010 at 12:01 am

by Richard

Hard to believe that for 124 years, people have actually hung out at a place called Gobbler’s Knob on this date to watch a large, furry rodent come out of his burrow. Yep, it’s Groundhog Day and the folks in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania,  are all set to freak out.

I mean, come on. What else is there to do in Punxsutawney? I think it says a lot when the highlight of a town’s year is seeing whether or not a rodent will espy his own shadow. Kind of sad, actually.

Especially considering the good folks of Punxsutawney have made up an entire mythology for the groundhog, Punxsutawney Phil. Supposedly, there’s only been one groundhog hanging around since 1886. The folks say he takes a sip of the elixir of life every summer at the Groundhog Picnic and that gives him an extra seven years of life. Of course, were that true, right now he’d have 744 more years of life. If this continues, we could have a functional immortal on our hands. Trust me, I did the math. (I know. How sad is that?)

Seriously, let’s all storm the good people of Punxsutawney and demand they give up the elixir of life. I’ll be glad to hold the groundhog hostage. Well, I will as long as I don’t have to actually touch the thing.

Anyway. According to legend, if Punxsutawney Phil sees his shadow today, it will mean six more weeks of winter. If he doesn’t see his shadow, it’s supposed to mean an early spring.

Personally, I’d rather rely on long-range forecasting based on computer models and backed up by satellite eyes. I know. It’s so unrealistic to suppose weather can be forecasted by something other than a fuzzy piece of walking roadkill.

Ah, well. I guess that’s life in the big Gobbler’s Knob.

*no, not the movie. Although that is one of this dude’s all-time favorite movies.

Share on Facebook Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Cull De Sac

Posted on January 28, 2010 at 12:01 am

by Richard

First off, yes, I know the title looks like it’s spelled wrong. It’s a pun, or a play on words. You’ll get it in a little bit. Seems there a bit of a kerfluffle around now about cul de sacs, streets that have one entrance and then end in the opposite side with a circle in which to turn around. According to an urban planning professor, they’re bad. Bad for kids, bad for parents, bad in general.

Blah, blah, blah. That’s from me. (notice how I take such reasoned discourse when someone espouses an opinion that’s different from my own? I am the epitome of polite debate, yeah?) Still, despite the withering nature of my own attack, I feel the professor has a bit more to say. Shall we?

. . . if you live on a typical cul de sac, there is probably no way for them to walk to anything fun — the movies, the mall. So either we are stuck chauffeuring them (that’s why cul de sacs are so hard on moms), or they have to drive themselves, sometimes for miles, even to get a Slurpee. And the least safe place for teens to be is behind the wheel of a car.

Now, think of the way cul de sac after cul de sac empties into one, big access road. Usually those roads are wide and highway-like. Cars speed down them so fast, woe to any weirdo who wanted to walk to the grocery. But of course, that’s usually a moot point, because in the newer developments, there aren’t any sidewalks anyway. Result?

Flab!

Flabby kids and parents. Unlike our grandparents, we have no way of walking anywhere. And by the way, walking used to be a great way to meet the neighbors, too. Now everyone’s sealed inside their house or a car (and sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference).

Those are actually the thoughts of Lenore Skenazy, the lady to whose blog I linked. She’s paraphrasing the urban planning professor. Don’t you just love the complete and direct sourcing I give to you all? It’s impeccable.

But back to the problem at hand. And that problem is that they’re wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. And I’m not just saying that because we live in a cul de sac. Although it helps. I’ve talked to a lot of our neighbors here about this and we all agree that these dudes and dudettes don’t know what they’re talking about. Our cul de sac lets out onto a smallish, but still busy street. Our little dudes get all the street-crossing problems they can handle, considering cars hardly ever actually stop at the stop sign.

Hop on a bike and they can ride along sidewalks to a small shopping center that has everything from a grocery store and a pizza joint to a hair cutting salon and a UPS store. I really think it’s the best of both worlds. We got a semi-isolated place for our little dudes to roam around in and we also get the ability to teach them about crossing streets and finding their own entertainment on a bike. That way they won’t get so fat there’ll be a natural-selection cull down the road. (See? There’s the pun. Not much, but it was all I had.)

I say, enjoy the cul de sacs for what they are. And, if you want to work on the little dudes and dudettes, just kick them out and lock the door for a while. They’ll get the hint.

Share on Facebook Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Top